Building a Google AdWords Strategy in the Cost-Per-Click Era

By 2004, AdWords had matured considerably from the flat-rate impressions product that launched in 2000. Cost-per-click pricing and relevance-weighted ranking had been in place since February 2002, geotargeting had arrived in 2003 and Google itself was in the middle of the run-up to its August 2004 public offering, a sign of how central advertising revenue had become to the business. For a business starting an account from nothing, the tools available were more capable than they had been two years earlier, but also more involved to set up well. Here is a straightforward build order.

Step 1: Structure campaigns around distinct goals, not one big list

Before touching keywords, decide how many separate campaigns you need. A campaign should represent a distinct goal, budget or geography, since AdWords let advertisers set daily budgets and targeting at the campaign level. A business selling both a consumer product and a business service, for example, was better served by two separate campaigns with their own budgets and messaging than one combined account trying to serve both audiences at once.

Step 2: Break each campaign into tight ad groups

Inside each campaign, ad groups should cluster closely related keywords that could realistically share the same ad copy. A single ad group covering both “running shoes” and “hiking boots” forces one generic ad to try to serve two different searcher intents, which drags down click-through rate for both. Splitting them into separate ad groups, each with copy written specifically for that group’s keywords, consistently earned better results under the ranking system Google had used since 2002, since click-through rate directly affected both position and cost.

Step 3: Choose match types deliberately

By 2004, AdWords supported broad, phrase and exact match types, giving advertisers real control over how loosely a keyword could match a search query. Broad match reached the widest audience but often pulled in irrelevant traffic; exact match was narrow but highly targeted. A sensible starting strategy was to begin with phrase and exact match on core terms, where intent was clearest, and use broad match sparingly, paired with close monitoring, to discover new keyword variations worth adding deliberately later.

Step 4: Add negative keywords early

Negative keywords, which excluded an ad from showing for specific unwanted queries, were one of the most underused tools available in 2004. A business selling premium products, for instance, could exclude queries containing “free” or “cheap” to avoid paying for clicks from searchers who were never going to buy. Reviewing the search terms report regularly and adding negatives as patterns emerged kept wasted spend from accumulating quietly over time.

Step 5: Write ad copy for the searcher, not the brand

Ad copy that led with the searcher’s actual need, rather than the company’s name or a vague slogan, consistently earned stronger click-through rates, which mattered directly under Google’s relevance-weighted ranking. Including the specific keyword being targeted in the ad text itself, where it fit naturally, tended to reinforce relevance both to the searcher and to Google’s ranking system.

Step 6: Use geotargeting if your business is local

Geotargeting, introduced in 2003, let advertisers limit ads to specific countries, regions or cities rather than showing nationally by default. A local service business that skipped this step was paying for clicks from searchers it could never serve, a simple and avoidable waste that geotargeting eliminated entirely.

Step 7: Review and refine on a fixed schedule

An AdWords account was never a set-and-forget purchase. Reviewing performance by keyword and ad group on a regular schedule, pausing what was not converting, expanding what was and testing new ad copy against what already worked, was what separated accounts that improved over time from ones that stagnated at whatever settings they launched with.

Putting it together

None of these seven steps required a large budget or outside agency help. A tightly structured account, built deliberately around match types, negative keywords and geotargeting rather than left on broad defaults, consistently outperformed a broader, less disciplined setup at a comparable spend, a pattern that had already held true since the ranking changes of 2002 and only became more pronounced as the platform matured through 2004.

---

Keep exploring: browse more Marketing Strategy guides, see everything we published in 2004 or check out the Digital Business Marketing Awards.